White

White v. White

Good Law
1893 Cal. LEXIS 598·97 Cal. 604·32 P. 600
Supreme Court of CaliforniaMarch 24, 1893No. 15043California386 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Garoutte, J.

In this action a decree of divorce was rendered in favor of appellant, and H. T. Cresswell was appointed a referee by the court to take testimony, and report thereon as to the character, condition, and value of the property of respondent, preliminary to a rendition of final judgment. The decree required that the costs and expenses of the referee should be paid by respondent.

The referee filed a petition asking the court to make an order directing respondent to forthwith pay into court the sum of two thousand five hundred dollars, to be used in the payment of the costs and expenses of such reference. The appellant in this proceeding appeared at the hearing of the said petition, joined with the referee in asking for the order, but objected to the court granting respondent permission to mortgage his property for the purpose of securing the money wherewith to comply with the order; and the consideration, of appellant’s objection was the matter of contest before the court.

If we understand appellant’s affidavits, it was contended by her that respondent was able to procure the money from other sources, but the affidavits and oral evidence placed before the court at the hearing are…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.