Flash

Ex-Mission Land & Water Co. v. Flash

Good Law
1893 Cal. LEXIS 600·97 Cal. 610·32 P. 600
Supreme Court of CaliforniaMarch 24, 1893No. 14731California6,429 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Vanclief, J.

The defendants, having foreclosed a mortgage on the laud of the plaintiff, purchased the land at the foreclosure sale for a sum less than the amount due on the mortgage, and caused a judgment to be docketed against the plaintiff for the deficiency. The plaintiff brought this action to set aside and annul the decree of foreclosure and the judgment for the deficiency, and also to cancel the notes and mortgage on which the decree was founded, on the alleged ground of fraud in procuring the notes and mortgage.

The judgment of the court below was in favor of the plaintiff, granting all the relief prayed for. Defendants appeal from the judgment, and from an order denying their motion for a new trial.

The facts, as found by the court, relevant to the questions presented are substantially as follows: In March, 1887, the administrator of the estate of Augustine Olvera offered for sale, at public auction, a tract of laud situate in the county of San Diego, containing four thousand *616 five hundred acres, pursuant to order of the superior court of the county of Los Angeles, in which said estate was then being administered.

One Charles H. Forbes requested the defendants to join him in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.