Marshall

Marshall v. Taylor

Good Law
1893 Cal. LEXIS 861·98 Cal. 55·32 P. 867
Supreme Court of CaliforniaMarch 31, 189314674California2,900 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Garoutte, J.

— This was an action for damages, plaintiff alleging by her complaint that the defendant with force and violence made an indecent assault upon her, and then and there wickedly seduced, debauched, and carnally knew her, when and whereby she became pregnant with child. . A trial resulted in a verdict for plaintiff in the sum of twenty-five thousand dollars, and this appeal is prosecuted from the judgment and order denying a motion for a new trial. It is developed by the evidence that the defendant is a man of mature years, of large property interests, and at the time the alleged cause of action arose was residing with his wife and daughters at a seaside resort in San Diego County, and, among his various business callings, was "there engaged in keeping a hotel. The plaintiff was an employee of the defendant, engaged as a waitress at the hotel. She was of the age of sixteen years and ten months, had seen considerable of the world, having resided with her mother in various localities, and, as indicated by her evidence and correspondence introduced at the trial, may be considered a bright and intelligent girl for her years. *57 The proof of the seduction rests alone upon the testimony…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.