Sansome

People v. Sansome

Good Law
1893 Cal. LEXIS 896·98 Cal. 235·33 P. 202
Supreme Court of CaliforniaMay 11, 189320948California862 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

— The defendant was charged by information with the crime of burglary, committed at Iowa Hill, in the *237 county of Placer, on the tenth day of May, 1891. He was arraigned and pleaded not guilty to the charge. At the trial witnesses were called and examined by the people and by defendant, but the latter did not take the stand and testify in his own behalf. At the conclusion of the evidence the district attorney made an opening argument to the jury, speaking about thirty minutes. Defendant’s counsel then declined to make any argument at all. The court thereupon instructed the jury, and they retired to deliberate upon their verdict. Within a reasonable time the jury returned and presented to the court their verdict, finding the defendant guilty of burglary in the second degree. Time was then fixed for pronouncing judgment, and when that time arrived counsel for defendant moved the court in arrest of judgment and for a new trial, but upon what grounds does not appear from the record, except that in support thereof he presented, read, and filed five affidavits to show misconduct on the part of certain jurors. The time for passing sentence ■was then, on motion of the district…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.