Boyson

Boyson v. Thorn

Caution
1893 Cal. LEXIS 959·21 L.R.A. 233·98 Cal. 578·33 P. 492
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJune 12, 189314534California3,225 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Haynes, J.

Defendant demurred to plaintiff’s complaint, the demurrer was sustained, aud judgment was thereupon rendered dismissing the action, from which judgment the plaintiff appeals.

The complaint alleges that Frank G. Newlands is the owner and in. possession and control of the Palace Hotel in the city of San Francisco, and of a public restaurant attached thereto, and conducted the same as a hotel and restaurant, and that the defendant during all the times mentioned in the complaint was the agent of Newlands, and as such had charge of the business thereof and direction of the servants therein; that immediately prior to November 1, 1889, Newlands entered into an agreement whereby plaintiff hired certain rooms in said hotel, as lodgings for himself and wife from November 1, 1889, at the monthly rent of one hundred dollars; that they were to have their meals at said restaurant, or furnished from said restaurant to their said rooms, he paying therefor the usual rates; that they entered and occupied the rooms, and in all things complied with said agreement, but that on December 5, 1889, the “defendant maliciously and with intent to oppress, annoy, and disturb plaintiff ill the occupancy of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.