Malarin

City of Monterey v. Malarin

Good Law
1893 Cal. LEXIS 655·99 Cal. 290·33 P. 840
Supreme Court of CaliforniaAugust 15, 1893No. 15006California440 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Fitzgerald, J.

This is an action by the city of Monterey, a municipal corporation, to abate an alleged public nuisance caused by the obstruction of an alleged public highway of that city, and to enjoin the defendants from further maintaining the same. The complaint in substance alleges that plaintiff is the owner and entitled to the possession and control of the laud therein described, and that the same is a public street within its corporate limits; that defendants have erected and maintained upon said street certain buildings and fences which obstruct the street and are a nuisance. These allegations are specifically denied by the answer. Defendants had judgment, and plaintiff appeals upon the judgment roll alone.

The court in its decision found: —

It is claimed by appellant that the findings do not support the judgment. This claim is urged upon the ground that the use of the strip of land described in the complaint by the public, as found by the court in its sixth finding, was such as to constitute it a public street within the meaning of section 2619 of the Political Code; that said section is in the nature of a statute of limitations, therefore a finding by the court of knowledge by the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.