Gunn

Gunn v. Bank of California

Good Law
1893 Cal. LEXIS 667·99 Cal. 349·33 P. 1105
Supreme Court of CaliforniaAugust 22, 1893No. 14248California1,819 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Haven, J.

The plaintiff is a real estate broker, and brought this action to recover from the defendant one thousand dollars for commissions alleged to be due him for obtaining a purchaser of certain real estate owned by defendant. Judgment was rendered in the superior court in favor of the plaintiff for the amount demanded, and from this judgment and an order denying its motion for a new trial, the defendant appeals.

It appears from the record that the plaintiff and defendant entered into a written contract by which-the plaintiff was authorized “to sell” the property described therein on or before January 20, 1890, for the sum of forty-one thousand dollars, or any less sum which might thereafter be fixed by defendant; and in the event of the property being sold by plaintiff within the time named, the defendant promised to pay to him a commission of one thousand dollars upon any sum which defendant might accept for the same. The court below found that the plaintiff complied with this contract on his part by obtaining within the time fixed in the contract a purchaser who was ready, willing, and able to purchase the property mentioned for the price of forty-one thousand dollars, “and that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.