Marten

Marten v. Paul O. Burns Wine Co.

Good Law
1893 Cal. LEXIS 668·99 Cal. 355·33 P. 1107
Supreme Court of CaliforniaAugust 22, 1893No. 15068California1,055 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Fitzgerald, J.

This action was brought to recover four thousand dollars and interest, paid by plaintiff to the defendant corporation for five thousand shares of its capital stock. The recovery is sought upon a rescission of the contract of sale, on the ground that plaintiff was induced to make the purchase by the false and fraudulent representations of the defendant as to the profits of its business and the value of its stock. The stock was purchased in March, 1887, and the alleged discovery of the facts constituting the fraud complained of was made January 20, 1890, and the attempt to rescind was made on April 23, 1890. Defendant had judgment and plaintiff appeals therefrom, and also from the order denying his motion for a new trial.

Upon the question of rescission, which is the only one necessary to be determined on this appeal, the court in its decision found in effect, that at the time of the purchase of the stock by plaintiff he had full knowledge of the true value thereof, and of the resources, liabilities, assets, and actual condition of the, defendant corporation; that the stock when purchased by plaintiff was worth. the price, paid for it, and that he never discovered any fact or facts…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.