Freshour

Freshour v. Hihn

Good Law
1893 Cal. LEXIS 688·99 Cal. 443·34 P. 87
Supreme Court of CaliforniaAugust 31, 1893No. 14941California1,870 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Haven, J.

The plaintiff is the road overseer of Soquel Road District, in Santa Cruz County, and this action was commenced by him to have an obstruction placed by defendant in a public highway in that district abated as a nuisance, and also to recover from defendant the sum of ten dollars for every day the obstruction remained after he had received notice to remove it.

The judgment of the superior court was in favor of plaintiff, ánd was to the effect that the obstruction complained of be' abated as a nuisance, and that plaintiff recover from defendant in addition to the costs of the action the sum of eight hundred and seventy dollars, the penalty demanded in the complaint, because of defendant’s failure to remove the obstruction. The defendant appeals.

1 1. The objection is made that the complaint is fatally defective in its description of the highway defendant is charged to have obstructed. The complaint alleges that the highway referred to is forty feet wide, and that it commences at a certain point named, thence following the course and distance of a given line “to the line of average high tide to the bay of Monterey”; but it is not directly averred whether the land thus described is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.