Fulton

Fulton v. Jansen

Good Law
1893 Cal. LEXIS 719·99 Cal. 587·34 P. 331
Supreme Court of CaliforniaOctober 3, 1893No. 19130California1,781 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Searls, J.

This action was brought by the respondent to enforce the specific performance of a contract to convey certain real property situate in the county of Los Angeles. Plaintiff had judgment, from which and from an order refusing a new trial defendants appeal. »

The findings of the court show, in substance, that on the *589 thirteenth day pf October, 1889, one Jason Brown was the owner of the land in dispute, and certain other land of which it was an undivided part; that said Brown, in the presence of defendants and upon the land, pointed out to plaintiff certain boundaries defining the northerly portion of the tract, which lie offered to sell to plaintiff and plaintiff agreed to buy for four hundred and fifty dollars — two hundred dollars in cash and the remaining sum of two hundred and fifty dollars in one year, without interest, a deed to be executed and delivered when the final payment was made, Fulton, the plaintiff, paid the two hundred dollars to Brown on the following day, and received a receipt therefor from Brown. One hundred dollars of the amount so paid was borrowed from Christian Jansen, for which plaintiff gave a promissory note payable within eighteen months with…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.