Lane

People v. Lane

Good Law
100 Cal. 379·1893 Cal. LEXIS 805·34 P. 856
Supreme Court of CaliforniaDecember 1, 1893No. 20906California2,588 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Haynes, J.

The defendant was tried for the murder of William G. Canfield. The jury returned a verdict of guilty of murder in the first degree, with imprisonment for life. This appeal is from the judgment rendered upon the verdict, and from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.

Appellant, at the time of the homicide, was a constable at Sanger, Fresno county. Late at night he went to a house of prostitution for the purpose of arresting the deceased and one Coleman for residing in a house of ill-fame, taking two men whom he found upon the street as a posse to aid him in making the arrest. Arriving at the house appellant knocked at the door, and replied to a question from one of the inmates that he was Lane, the constable. The girl opened the door, when appellant and the other two men entered, and appellant then said he “wanted every man in the house.”

George Glenn, one of the men who went to the house with the constable, was called on behalf of the people, and testified that Lane told him he had to go with him, and that he was going to arrest “these men.” -That another man was with Lane whom he did not know, and had never since seen; that when the door was open he walked in…

dissent Opinion

Beatty, J.

dissented from the order denying a hearing in Bank.

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.