Wells

People v. Wells

Good Law
100 Cal. 459·1893 Cal. LEXIS 819·34 P. 1078
Supreme Court of CaliforniaDecember 22, 1893No. 21027California1,995 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

McFarland, J.

Information charges the defendant Wells, jointly with Ollie Hutchings, alias Grace Gilbert, with the crime of forgery. Wells was tried separately, was convicted, and appeals from the judgment and from an order denying a new trial.

Appellant contends for a new trial upon several grounds: Because the assistant district attorney, representing the people, in his opening address to the jury made misstatements of facts prejudicial to appellant; because the court, while excluding all other witnesses not under examination, refused to so exclude a policeman who was a witness for and an active participant in the prosecution; because the court refused to strike out certain answers of the witness Leavitt; because one or two of the jurors were guilty of misconduct; because there is newly discovered evidence material to appellant; and because appellant was prevented from having a fair and impartial trial by reason of the misconduct of the prosecuting attorney in asking a certain question of the witness Lees and certain questions of the appellant when on the stand as a witness on his own behalf. The last ground of contention is the only one which we deem it necessary to largely discuss.

It…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.