Dolbeer

Dolbeer v. Livingston

Good Law
100 Cal. 617·1893 Cal. LEXIS 842·35 P. 328
Supreme Court of CaliforniaDecember 30, 1893No. 19246California939 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Belcher, J.

On July 3, 1890, the plaintiff entered into a written agreement with the defendants, J. B. Livingston and W. H. Clarke, under the firm name of Livingston, Clarke & Co., whereby he leased to them the steamer Farallón for a certain time, commencing *619 July 8, 1890, and upon certain terms and conditions. And, to secure performance of the terms of the agreement on their part, the said defendants delivered to the plaintiff a bond signed by themselves as principals, and by W. M. Ginty and W. H. Clarke as sureties.

The plaintiff commenced this action on the said bond, alleging that Livingston, Clarke & Co. had failed to pay the full amount of money due under the charter party for the use of the steamer, and demanding judgment against all of the defendants for the amount so due and unpaid, with interest thereon.

The defendant, Ginty, answered the complaint and denied that he, as a surety or otherwise, executed to the plaintiff, or at all, the bond sued upon.

Upon the issue thus raised the case was tried by the court, without a jury, and judgment given for the plaintiff as prayed for.

From this judgment Ginty appeals on the judgment-roll, and the only point made for a reversal is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.