Brown

Brown v. Campbell

Good Law
100 Cal. 635·1893 Cal. LEXIS 845·35 P. 433
Supreme Court of CaliforniaDecember 30, 1893No. 15057California3,143 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Haven, J.

This action was originally brought by the plaintiff against the defendants, Campbell and Kent, to recover the sum of two thousand five hundred and forty-nine dollars and fifty cents, surplus in their hands, arising upon the sale of certain real property conveyed to them in trust to secure an indebtedness of plaintiff to the San Francisco Savings Union. These defendants answered admitting that after the payment of plaintiff’s indebtedness secured by the trust deed there remained in their hands the sum demanded by plaintiff; but they also alleged that one Priest claimed to be entitled to recover such surplus, and they asked for an order requiring him to be brought into court as a party to the action, and that they be permitted to pay the fund in controversy into court, to be disposed of by the judgment in the action. This order was made, and thereafter Priest filed an answer, and also a cross-complaint, in which he alleged in substance that, prior to the sale of the real property by the defendants Campbell and Kent under the deed of trust, he had levied an attachment upon such property in an action brought by him against one Joseph Brown in one of the superior courts of this state…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.