Granger's Bank of Cal. v. Superior Court of San Francisco

Good Law
101 Cal. 198·1894 Cal. LEXIS 1006·35 P. 642
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJanuary 26, 1894No. 15323California384 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

McFarland, J.

This proceeding is an original petition in this court for a writ of prohibition. There was a decision here in favor of petitioner August 19, 1893; but within thirty days thereafter an order of this court was made granting a rehearing. Petitioner now moves to set aside said order granting said rehearing upon the ground that the court had no power to make it—contending that a motion for a new trial was the proper remedy.

The point was substantially determined against petitioner’s contention in In re Tyler, 71 Cal. 374 . It may be further said that the present constitution provides that the judgment of a department of this court shall be final in thirty days, unless before that time ordered into Bank; and that there has been a rule in this court ever since its origin that a judgment of the court in Bank shall be final in thirty days, unless before that time a rehearing shall have been granted. Neither the constitution nor the rule makes any distinction between cases of appellate jurisdiction and cases of original jurisdiction; and indeed most of the cases here which are in form original are, like the case at bar, in their nature appellate. Therefore, to apply to this court those…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.