Hollenbach

Hollenbach v. Schnabel

Good Law
101 Cal. 312·1894 Cal. LEXIS 1032·35 P. 872
Supreme Court of CaliforniaFebruary 9, 1894No. 19248California955 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Seabls, J.

This is an action of claim and delivery, to recover possession of certain liquors sold and delivered by plaintiff to defendant Schnabel, and which, it is claimed, were procured by fraudulent representations of defendant.

The cause was tried by the court, written findings filed, and judgment ordered in favor of defendant:

Plaintiff moved for a new trial, and, his motion being overruled, appeals from the order denying such new trial.

The court found, among other things, that on the twenty-eighth day of December, 1889, the sheriff of Los Angeles county, under and by virtue of an affidavit, undertaking, etc., filed by direction of the plaintiff, took possession of the property, and thereafter and on *315 the third day of January, 1890, delivered the same to the plaintiff, and that the value thereof was and is seven hundred and twenty-one dollars and seventy-five cents.

Appellant contends that there was no evidence in support of these findings.

There was on file among the papers in the case the affidavit and undertaking on behalf of plaintiff for a return of the property, describing it as in the complaint; the return of the sheriff duly certified, showing the taking of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.