Solari

Action to quiet plaintiff's title to the land described in the complaint against the claims of defendant; and for the recovery of the possession thereof; also to cancel a tax deed issued to defendant therefor as a cloud on plaintiff’s title; and for rents and profits, and damages for withholding.

Plaintiff had judgment, and defendant appeals from the judgment and the order denying his motion for a new trial.

The evidence shows that plaintiff was the owner of the property described in the complaint at the date of its purchase by the defendant. This being so, it is only necessary to consider but two of the questions discussed by counsel in their briefs, as their decision necessarily disposes of the others raised by the record on this appeal.

These questions are:

On these questions the court in its decision found adversely to appellant, and as the findings thereon, as well as the other findings attacked by the specifications, are fully justified by the evidence, they will not, under the *389 well-established rule of this court, be disturbed, unless the rulings of the court complained of in relation to the admission and rejection of evidence bearing upon these questions were…