London, Paris, & Am. Bank, Ltd. v. Smith

Good Law
101 Cal. 415·1894 Cal. LEXIS 1050·35 P. 1027
Supreme Court of CaliforniaFebruary 27, 1894No. 15363California2,416 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Haynes, J.

The complaint alleges in substance that on the twenty-fourth day of August, 1885, Andrew Smith applied to the London, Paris, and American Bank, limited, to extend a credit accommodation to the firm of Harrington, and Smith, a copartnership which then, and until the death of Andrew Smith in January, *417 1892, existed and carried on business at Seattle, in the present state of Washington, and to secure the same executed to the plaintiff, David Calm, a deed conveying to him. certain lands situate in the county of San Mateo, in this state, and at the same time, and as part of said transaction, the said grantor and grantee entered into an agreement, reciting, among other things, “ that said conveyance is intended to secure the payment to the London, Paris, and American Bank, limited, of all sums of money which are now or may hereafter become due from the party of the first part, or the firm of Harrington and Smith, of Seattle, Washington Territory, with interest, and all costs and charges incurred by said party of the second part, together with interest on all said indebtedness at the rate of eight per cent per annum.”

“And it is agreed that so long as the said party of the first…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.