Griffith

Griffith v. N.Y. Life Ins. Co.

Good Law
101 Cal. 627·1894 Cal. LEXIS 1090·36 P. 113
Supreme Court of CaliforniaMarch 15, 1894No. 18180California308 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Searls, J.

This is an action by the appellant, as plaintiff, to recover from the defendant and respondent twenty thousand dollars, interests and costs, upon two twenty-year endowment policies of insurance averred to have been issued by the defendant, an insurance company, for ten thousand dollars each, to and upon the life of E. J. Griffith, loss, if any, payable to his wife, Mary V. Griffith, or in case of her death to the representatives or assigns of the insured, and in the event of his *635 survival for the period of twenty years to him, the said Griffith. Griffith died within two years after the policies issued, and his wife, the beneficiary named therein, is the plaintiff and appellant herein.

The policies were issued and all payments were to be made at New York, in the state of New York, -where defendant is organized.

The cause was tried by the court without a jury, written findings filed and a judgment rendered thereon in favor of defendant for costs, from which judgment and from an order denying a motion for a new trial plaintiff appeals.

It is contended by the appellant: 1. That there was a perfect legal delivery of policy 793 (323,793), whereupon the right of the plaintiff as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.