Felton

Felton v. West

Good Law
102 Cal. 266·1894 Cal. LEXIS 632·36 P. 676
Supreme Court of CaliforniaApril 25, 1894No. 15456California1,533 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Garoutte, J.

The appellants, on May 16, 1893, executed and delivered to the respondent their promissory note for the sum of ninety thousand eight hundred and sixty dollars and twenty-six cents. This note was dated, delivered, and made payable in San Francisco. It was secured by a mortgage upon lands situated in the state of Oregon. The appellants made two payments thereon, and then defaulted. Respondent thereupon began suit in the proper court in Oregon to foreclose the said mortgage. He was unable to, and did not, obtain personal service of the summons in such action upon appellants, as they were residents of California, and could not be found in the state of Oregon; service was, therefore, had upon them by publication only. This mode of service appeared upon the face of the record in said suit, and a judgment in the usual form of foreclosure was made and entered therein, decreeing a sale of the mortgaged property to satisfy the indebtedness. Under this judgment the property was sold for about thirty-two thousand dollars, and the amount was credited upon the note. There *268 was no judgment for a deficiency. The respondent then began this action in the state of California upon the note for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.