Treanor
Treanor v. Houghton
Opinion
lead Opinion
Searls, J.
Thi§ is an action by a street contractor to recover one hundred and thirty-two dollars and eighty cents, assessed upon the lot of defendant for its pro rata of the cost of improving Julian street, in the city of San Jose, under proceedings had by virtue of the act of March 18, 1885, Statutes 1885, page 147.
Plaintiff had judgment, from whi,ch defendant appeals.
The cause comes up on the judgment-roll without a statement or bill of exceptions.
The city of San Jose is, and at all the times hereinafter mentioned was, a municipal corporation.
Julian street, at the several dates hereinafter mentioned, was, and is, an open, located, public street, in said city of San Jose, with duly established width and grade.
On the twelfth day of March, 1888, the mayor and common council of the city of San Jose passed and approved a resolution declaring its intention “ to order that portion of Julian street between First street and the eastern city limits to be improved to the official grade, said improvement to consist of excavating, grading, curbing, guttering, and graveling .the roadway, the gravel to be screened.”