Moore

People v. Moore

Caution
103 Cal. 508·1894 Cal. LEXIS 811·37 P. 510
Supreme Court of CaliforniaAugust 11, 1894No. 21087California1,108 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

McFarland, J.

Appellant was convicted of the crime against nature, and was sentenced to suffer the very severe penalty of imprisonment in the state prison for the term of forty-one years. He appeals from the judgment.

The appellant had no counsel in the court below; con *510 sequently there is no statement or bill of exceptions before us, and, of course, no evidence. Afterwards counsel took an appeal for appellant, and is compelled to rely upon the judgment-roll, or what is called in section 1207 of the Penal Code a “ record of the action.” This includes only the indictment or information, a copy of the minutes of the plea or demurrer, a copy of the minutes of the trial, the instructions given or refused, and a copy of the judgment. The offense charged in this case is in its nature coarse and detestable; but it is an offense easily charged and difficult to disprove; it affords great facility for a false accusation, made for the purpose of revenge and injury; and usually its proof depends mainly upon the testimony of an accomplice. These considerations, and the very severe penalty imposed, induce us to look closely into the only record which appellant’s counsel on the appeal could bring…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.