Ramboz

Ramboz v. Stowell

Good Law
103 Cal. 588·1894 Cal. LEXIS 829·37 P. 519
Supreme Court of CaliforniaAugust 18, 1894No. 19345California1,474 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Vanclief, J.

Action to quiet title to a lot of land in the city of Los Angeles. It is admitted that Margaret J. Starkey was the owner of the lot in question on June 13, 1878, as her separate property, and both parties claim title from her. On that day Mrs. Starkey, for a valuable and sufficient consideration, signed, sealed, and delivered to Helen L. Grinnell a deed of the lot, the acknowledgment of the execution of which was certified by a notary public (A. C. Holmes) in the form required for an unmarried woman, and not otherwise, and the deed was recorded on the same day. On September 19, 1887, Helen L. Grinnell, in consideration of eleven thousand dollars, conveyed the lot to defendant by deed recorded October 4, 1887. On May 13, 1891, Mrs. Starkey, for the nominal consideration of one hundred dollars, but without any valuable consideration, conveyed the lot to plaintiff, who is her daughter, and who, on the following day (May 14, 1891), com *590 menced this action. At the date of the deed to plaintiff she had actual notice of the prior deed of her mother to Helen L. Grinnell.

The trial court gave judgment for defendant upon the finding that the plaintiff was estopped from denying that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.