Hellman

Temple Street Cable Railway v. Hellman

Good Law
103 Cal. 634·1894 Cal. LEXIS 837·37 P. 530
Supreme Court of CaliforniaAugust 31, 1894No. 19136California1,619 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Beatty, J.

On May 5, 1890, the plaintiff was a corporation owning and engaged in operating a street railway at Los Angeles, and the defendant, Marco Hellman, was conducting a baseball park on First street in that city. For the purpose of increasing the traffic on its road the plaintiff at the date mentioned entered into an arrangement in pursuance of which it executed to Heilman its negotiable promissory note for $5,500, payable in two years, with interest at the rate of ten per cent per annum, which he transferred to a third party, who at the commencement of this action was the owner and holder thereof. In consideration of the receipt of this note Heilman on his part agreed, among other things, to discontinue the playing of baseball at the First-street grounds, and within sixty days to establish, and for two years thereafter to maintain, a first-class baseball park on a tract of land adjacent to plaintiff’s line, of which he had become the lessee. He further agreed to give at the new grounds not less than one hundred and four games of baseball or other equivalent entertainment each year, to provide suitable accommo *637 dations for the public, and to pay over to the plaintiff, monthly, ten…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.