Markham

People ex rel. Hargrave v. Markham

Good Law
104 Cal. 232·1894 Cal. LEXIS 886·37 P. 918
Supreme Court of CaliforniaSeptember 27, 1894No. 15877California1,449 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Beatty, J.

This is an agreed case by which the question is submitted to the court whether at the approaching general election a judge of the superior court of the county of Madera is to be chosen by popular vote. In form the proceeding is a petition for a writ of mandate to the governor commanding him to include in his forthcoming election proclamation a call for the election of said judge.

No question is raised as to the power of the court to issue its mandate to the head of the executive department of the state government, but, on the contrary, it is conceded that if the question stated is answered in the affirmative the writ shall issue.

The county of Madera was created by an act of the legislature approved March 11, 1893 (Stats., 1893, p. 168), out of territory theretofore included in the county of Fresno. The act provided, among other things, for the appointment of a board of commissioners to call, conduct, and verify the results of a special election of the officers necessary to complete the organization of the county. Among the officers to be so chosen, a judge of the superior court was expressly included. ■ In pursuance of these provisions a special election was held in said county…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.