Bloom

Bloom v. Hazzard

Good Law
104 Cal. 310·1894 Cal. LEXIS 908·37 P. 1037
Supreme Court of CaliforniaOctober 2, 1894No. 19424California656 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Belcher, J.

The plaintiff, as assignee of one Charles M. Stetson, brought this action to recover the sum of $844.90, balance alleged to be due and unpaid for services rendered by Stetson as constable in the levying upon and sale of certain real property under an execution issued upon a justice’s court judgment in favor of the defendant.

Before any services were rendered Stetson executed and delivered to defendant an agreement in writing, reading as follows:

Stetson, by his deputy, made the levy and sale, and was engaged in the work ten and one-half days. The defendant bid in the property for $1,248.10, and the return shows that the constable’s fees amounted to the sum of $928.90. On October 29, 1891, defendant paid to Stetson, or his deputy, $59.85, and of this sum $52.50 was to pay for said ten and one-half days’ work at the agreed price of $5 per day, and $7.35 was to pay certain extra expenses. Afterwards, on November 2d, defendant paid Stetson $10, and received from him a receipt reading as follows:

The court found that “said Stetson received and accepted said several sums of money, aggregating in the whole the sum of $69.85, in full of all demands which he had against the defendant on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.