Watkins

Watkins v. Wilhoit

Good Law
104 Cal. 395·1894 Cal. LEXIS 923·38 P. 53
Supreme Court of CaliforniaOctober 5, 1894No. 18167California1,270 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Beatty, J.

This action is in the nature of a creditor’s bill in equity to subject property in the hands or under the control of the defendants, Wilhoit and Lang-ford, to the payment of a judgment at law against defendant Bryant, in favor of the plaintiff.

A demurrer to the complaint having been sustained, *397 and the plaintiff haying declined to amend his complaint, judgment passed for defendants.

The plaintiff has appealed from the judgment upon the judgment-roll containing a bill of exceptions showing that the demurrer was sustained on the grounds “that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and that the action is barred by the statute of limitations.”

The complaint shows that on June 2,1890, the plaintiff recovered a judgment against Bryant for the sum of two thousand three hundred and forty-two dollars and sixty cents, on a promissory note made by the latter to the former on January 17; 1885, and that no part of the judgment has been paid.

That before and on February 16, 1886, said Bryant was indebted to others besides the plaintiff, and was then, and ever since has been, insolvent, though he was then the owner of considerable real and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.