Schurtz

San Francisco Breweries v. Schurtz

Good Law
104 Cal. 420·1894 Cal. LEXIS 929·38 P. 92
Supreme Court of CaliforniaOctober 29, 1894No. 19314California1,412 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Belcher, J.

The defendant, Joseph Schurtz, had a lease for. the term of four years and two months, dated October 5, 1889, of the basement of a building known as the Wilson block, in the city of Los Angeles. He used the leased premises for the purposes of a saloon and *425 restaurant, and bad caused to be attached to them certain personal property used in conducting his business.

On June 25, 1891, he executed to the plaintiff his promissory notes for sums aggregating four thousand five hundred dollars, and a mortgage to secure payment of the notes on his said leasehold estate and on all fixtures, improvements, and appliances, which had been attached to or made a part thereof, and also on all personal property, including a piano, used in and about said saloon and restaurant.

The mortgage was properly executed as a mortgage of real and personal property, and on the day of its date was by the mortgagee caused to be recorded in the recorder’s office of Los Angeles county.

In August, 1892, the plaintiff commenced this action to foreclose its mortgage, making Henry P. Wilson the appellant, and others parties defendant, upon the ground that they had, or claimed to have, some interest in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.