Barnard

Barnard v. Boller

Good Law
105 Cal. 214·1894 Cal. LEXIS 1139·38 P. 728
Supreme Court of CaliforniaDecember 26, 1894No. 18327California924 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Searls, J.

This is an action to quiet the title of plaintiff to a quarter section of land, fully described in the complaint and situate in the county of Tulare.

The cause was tried by the court without a jury, written findings filed, upon which plaintiff had judgment, quieting his title as prayed for in his complaint.

Defendant appeals from the judgment, and the case is presented upon the judgment-roll without a statement or bill of exceptions.

The findings show that on the twenty-sixth day of September, 1884, plaintiff entered the land in question under the homestead laws of the United States, at the United States land-office at Visalia, California. On the seventeenth day of November, 1890, plaintiff made the proper proofs under his homestead entry and received from the receiver a receipt in due form, entitling him to a patent for said land, which patent in due form *217 issued to him from the government of the United States February 23, 1892.

' After the issuing to plaintiff of said receipt, viz., after November 17, 1890, but before the patent issued, plaintiff became indebted to M. Schwartz & Son for goods, wares, and merchandise sold and delivered by them to said plaintiff, in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.