Childers

Childers v. San Jose Mercury Printing & Publishing Co.

Good Law
105 Cal. 284·1894 Cal. LEXIS 1152·38 P. 903
Supreme Court of CaliforniaDecember 31, 1894No. 15614California1,839 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Gaeoutte, J.

— This is an appeal from a judgment of the superior court of the county of Monterey, in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant herein, for the sum of two thousand dollars damages for an alleged *287 libel, and from an order denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial.

The defendant published in a daily issue of the San Jose Mercury, a newspaper printed and published in the city of San Jose, an article to the effect that the plaintiff, William. Childers, had committed the offense of burglary, upon the previous night, in said city of San Jose, by breaking and entering a business house of said city. Plaintiff by his complaint charged said publication to be a libel upon him, and brought this action for damages.

It is now insisted that the court misunderstood the law bearing upon the questions here involved, and that the following instructions, which were given to the jury, are unsound as declarations of legal principles: “1. All libels and slanders are conclusively presumed to be in some degree malicious; 2. Said publication was a libel upon the plaintiff, and entitles him to a verdict in his favor; 3. Damages in such a case as this are given: 1. To compensate the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.