Royce

People v. Royce

Good Law
106 Cal. 173·1895 Cal. LEXIS 589·39 P. 524
Supreme Court of CaliforniaFebruary 28, 1895No. 21081California1,154 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

McFarland, J.

In the opinion delivered in Department it is said that “the errors complained of are based upon rulings upon questions of evidence, and upon instructions to the jury”; and, as to such errors and questions, we are satisfied with that opinion. But *176 a hearing in Bank was ordered on account of a grave doubt whether, under any proper view of the law, there was evidence sufficient to warrant a conviction of the crime charged; and, from further consideration of the case, we are satisfied that there was not such evidence. '

The facts shown by the evidence are these: On February 21, 1893, the appellant was treasurer of the Veterans’ Home Association, a corporation, and on that day received a certain draft for the benefit of said association for ten thousand three hundred and fifty dollars. On the same day he deposited said draft with the Crocker-Woolworth National Bank of San Francisco, and the amount of the draft was credited to appellant’s personal account. The president of the bank testified that he “ did not hear him [appellant] give any direction as to whose credit it should be placed,” and that “ we did not place it to the credit of the association because we have not had any…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.