Warren

Warren v. Riddell

Good Law
106 Cal. 352·1895 Cal. LEXIS 612·39 P. 781
Supreme Court of CaliforniaMarch 11, 1895No. 15793California978 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Harrison, J.

Action to foreclose the lien of a street assessment in San Francisco.

The resolution of intention for the work for which the assessment was issued, as well as all the subsequent proceedings taken by the board of supervisors, provided for the grading of Santa Clara street, between Kansas and Utah streets, “to the official line and grade”; and the contract entered into by the plaintiffs with the superintendent of streets specified that the street was to be graded “ to the official grade and line.” The grade of Santa Clara street had been officially established, and a few months prior to the inception of the present work the board of supervisors had attempted to change this *353 grade, but their action proved abortive, by reason of not having acquired jurisdiction to pass the order for the change. The plaintiffs did not grade the street to the official grade, but graded it to the line that had been proposed for a change of the official grade, and this is made the ground of the defense to the present action. The court finds, however, that the plaintiffs performed all the terms and conditions of the contract to be performed on their part under the direction and to the satisfaction of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.