Regulation op Liquor Trappic—Police Power — Conflict Between County and Municipal Ordinance. — Where there is a conflict in terms between an ordinance of an incorporated town and an ordinance of the county in the regulations prescribed for the carrying on of the business of selling intoxicating liquors, in the exercise of the police power, the ordinance of the town has superior force within its municipal limits.

Id.—License por Revenue—Power op County.—It is within the power of a county to license for revenue the business of liquor dealing, and to collect such license from those doing business within the territorial limits of towns and cities inside of its boundaries.

Id.—Penalty op Ordinance Conflicting with Penal Code.—Where the penalty imposed for the violation of a county ordinance licensing the business of liquor dealing conflicts with the provisions of the Penal Code, the penal clause of the ordinance is void, but that does not destroy the whole of the section declaring the sale of , liquor without a license to be unlawful.

Id.—Pleading—Conclusion Against Statute — Complaint Referring to Penal Clause of Ordinance—Punishment Under Penal Code. While the rule is in force in this state requiring the conclusion of an indictment or information to be against the form of the statute, yet this rule is not made applicable by the Penal Code to complaints for misdemeanors in justices’ and police courts; and it is sufficient that such complaint sets forth the offense charged, with such particulars of time, place, person, and property, as to enable the defendant to understand distinctly the character of the offense complained of, and to answer the complaint, and it is not essential that such complaint should include a conclusion contrary to the form of the statute, and the fact that it includes a conclusion contrary to the provisions of a county ordinance does not tend to the prejudice of the substantial rights of the defendant, but the defendant may be punished, under the Penal Code, upon conviction of the offense.