Mooney
City of San Francisco v. Mooney
Opinion
lead Opinion
Henshaw, J.
Appeal by the defendant Delaney from the judgment and from the order denying him a new trial.
*587 The action was commenced by the city and county of San Francisco against the defendants named, and many others, to recover certain lands claimed and held by the defendants adversely to the city. The land claimed by appellant is part of the so-called Lafayette park. Lafayette park was delineated and described as a public park or square upon the Van Ness map. The facts of this case are identical in all essential particulars with those in the case of Hoadley v. San Francisco, 50 Cal. 265 , and Sawyer v. San Francisco, 50 Cal. 370 . The later cases of People v. Holladay, 68 Cal. 442 , Hoadley v. San Francisco, 70 Cal. 324 , San Francisco v. Holladay, 76 Cal. 18 , and People v. Holladay, 93 Cal. 244 ; 27 Am. St. Rep. 186 , follow and reannounce the rule of construction given to the act of the legislature, ratifying ordinances Nos. 822, 845, and the Van Ness map, first declared by the cases reported in the fiftieth volume of our reports.
Moreover, the soundness of the construction put by this court upon the ratifying act of the legislature of March 11, 1858, has been subjected to review…