Cotter

Cotter v. Lindgren

Good Law
106 Cal. 602·1895 Cal. LEXIS 648·39 P. 950
Supreme Court of CaliforniaMarch 30, 1895No. 19502California1,162 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Vancliee, J.

Action for damages alleged to have been suffered by the plaintiff in consequence of negligence of the defendant in leaving unguarded an excavation which he had made in the sidewalk of a street in the town of Bakersfield, into which plaintiff fell and was injured.

The plaintiff had judgment for sixteen hundred dollars, from which and an order denying a new trial the defendant has appealed.

1. The appellant contends that the court erred in overruling his general and special demurrer to the complaint. The following is a copy of the complaint:

The following are the grounds of demurrer: “1. That said complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action; 2. The complaint is uncertain in this: The complaint states that the said pit was dug on or about the ninth day of February, 1893, and that the same was left without protection, barriers, or lights to warn citizens of danger; the accident complained of is alleged to have occurred on or about the tenth day of February, 1893, a time subsequent to the ninth, but it is not stated that at the time of the alleged accident the said pit was not properly protected and guarded by barriers and lights sufficient to apprise…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.