Lion

Lion v. McClory

Good Law
106 Cal. 623·1895 Cal. LEXIS 652·40 P. 12
Supreme Court of CaliforniaApril 2, 1895No. 15787California919 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

McFarland, J.

This is an action to foreclose a mortgage executed by defendant to plaintiff to secure purchase money of the mortgaged premises, which had been sold and conveyed by the latter to the former. The defendant, in a cross-complaint, set up that he had been induced to purchase the premises by certain false and fraudulent representations concerning the same made by the plaintiff, and prayed, that the sale be rescinded, and that the mortgage, as well as a certain cash payment, be delivered up and restored to said defendant. The court rendered judgment for plaintiff, foreclosing the mortgage and denying the prayer of the cross-complaint. Defendant appeals from the judgment.

The appeal is based entirely upon the judgment-roll, which includes findings, and we see nothing on the face of the record to warrant a reversal. The findings negative some of the averments of the cross-complaint; but appellant contends that upon the facts found the judgment should have been for the defendant. The facts found are briefly these: Respondent never made any representations of any kind to appellant; but, in the spring of 1891, an enterprising real estate agent, without any authority from respondent, who was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.