Jameson

Jameson v. Hayward

Good Law
106 Cal. 682·1895 Cal. LEXIS 661·39 P. 1078
Supreme Court of CaliforniaApril 3, 1895No. 15743California1,714 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Searls, J.

This is an action for the partition of three fifty-vara water lots in the city and county of San Francisco.

The court found that the plaintiff was the owner of an undivided tenth of an estate for years, viz., an estate for ninety-nine years, from March 16, 1851, iu and to two of the three lots; that defendant George Brown is the owner of an undivided tenth interest of an estate for years, viz., an estate for ninety-nine years, in the third lot; that the defendant Alvinza Hayward is the owner of the remaining nine-tenths of said estate for ninety-nine years in all of the three lots, and is also the owner of the whole of the remainder or reversion, after the termination of said estate for ninety-nine years.

The court further found that actual partition could not be made of said property without great prejudice to the owners thereof, and ordered a sale to be made of the ninety-nine years’ estate.

At the trial plaintiff introduced evidence tending to show the relative values of the said estate for years and the reversion, and also as to the value of both titles, and testimony tending to show that the two, if sold separately, would realize less than if sold together.

Testimony was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.