Rohrbough

Rohrbough v. Johnson

Good Law
107 Cal. 144·1895 Cal. LEXIS 724·40 P. 37
Supreme Court of CaliforniaApril 15, 1895No. 15776California1,618 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Haynes, J.

Action in claim and delivery for fifty bales of hops.

Judgment for the plaintiff was entered upon the findings, and defendant appeals from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

Joel Eveland, a hopgrower, removed and delivered his crop of 1893 to one Felix Purcell at his hop-house, to be by him dried and baled. On September 11,1893, Eveland executed to the plaintiff his promissory note, payable eighty days after date, for the sum of twelve hundred dollars, which sum the plaintiff had advanced to Eveland to enable him to pay for picking the hops; and, to secure the payment thereof, Eveland also executed to the plaintiff an instrument purporting to be a chattel mortgage, in which the mortgaged property is described as “ consisting of the whole of the said mortgagor’s hop crop for the year 1893, and now being and lying in the hop-house of Felix Purcell, situated in Round Valley township, Mendocino county, California.” Said mortgage also provided that, if the mortgagee should thereafter deem himself insecure, he might take possession of said property and sell the same in the manner provided by law, without foreclosure, and from the proceeds pay the whole…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.