People ex rel. Loy v. Mount Shasta Mfg. Co.

Good Law
107 Cal. 256·1895 Cal. LEXIS 742·40 P. 391
Supreme Court of CaliforniaMay 22, 1895No. 15774California387 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Temple, J.

This is an information in the nature of a quo warranto to have it adjudged that the defendant is exercising corporate functions without right, and to enjoin it from doing so.

The complaint states that the defendant is doing business as a corporation; that it has a board of directors, a president, and a corporate seal; that it has capital stock upon which it has levied an assessment, is transacting business in corporate form, and claims in good faith to be a corporation; that the corporators have executed, acknowledged, and filed articles of incorporation, which are not set out at large in the complaint.

The articles of incorporation áre executed in the manner, and are in substance and form as required by the general provisions of the code for the creation of private corporations, but it is contended that the articles are defective because one of the purposes for which it was formed is expressed as being: “ To buy, lease, sell, mortgage, and otherwise deal in ... . railroads, tramways, and rights of way; to buy, lease, sell, mortgage, operate, construct, and maintain railroads, tramways,” etc., and *258 the incorporation was not constituted as the code requires railroad…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.