Union Ins. Co. v. Am. Fire Ins. Co.

Good Law
107 Cal. 327·1895 Cal. LEXIS 754·40 P. 431
Supreme Court of CaliforniaMay 25, 1895No. 15755California1,400 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Searls, J.

This action was brought to enforce a contract of reinsurance entered into by the parties hereto on the sixth day of June, 1889. The cause was tried by the court without a jury upon the amended complaint and answer thereto, and upon an agreed statement of facts. Written findings were filed, and judgment entered thereon in favor of defendant, from which judgment plaintiff, within sixty days next after the rendition thereof, appealed.

The agreed statement of facts upon which the cause was tried, after stating that the plaintiff, on May 24, 1889, insured certain property of the Seattle Lumber & Commercial Company in the sum of four thousand dollars against loss or damage by fire, contains the following:

*330 The question, presented under the pleadings and stipulated facts is simply this: Did the defendant, under its agreement of reinsurance, contract to indemnify plaintiff against loss and liability for and during its original contract of insurance, or was the undertaking • of defendant to indemnify plaintiff against such loss as might thereafter occur?

“ Insurance is a contract whereby one undertakes to indemnify another against loss, damage, or liability arising from an unknown…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.