Geary

Geary v. Bd. of Supervisors of San Diego

Good Law
107 Cal. 530·1895 Cal. LEXIS 788·40 P. 800
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJune 27, 1895No. 19462California772 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Garoutte, J.

— The proceedings upon which this action is based were commenced before the board of supervisors of San Diego county for the purpose of creating a private road. By a writ of review these proceedings were brought before the superior court and there held to be valid. This appeal is taken from such adjudication.

1. It appears, both by the petition and the order of the board of supervisors laying out the road, that the proceedings were inaugurated for the benefit of one *533 J. F. Wilson, in order that he might secure a way of access to his farm. Wilson is not one of the signers to the petition for the road, and it is insisted that, under section 2692 of the Political Code, one party at least who is directly benefited by the laying out of the road must sign the petition. Such a course certainly would be the better practice, and it is somewhat anomalous that Wilson, the party directly interested, did not indicate his assent to the proceedings by attaching his name to the petition; but we think the proceeding is void for other reasons, and therefore do not find it necessary to give a construction to section 2692 of the Political Code in this regard.

2. As is said in Hill v. Board of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.