Henry

Henry v. Barton

Good Law
107 Cal. 535·1895 Cal. LEXIS 789·40 P. 798
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJune 27, 1895No. 19477California409 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Garoutte, J.

Respondent in the trial court secured a judgment of mandate against Barton and others, trustees of the city of San Bernardino, requiring them, as such trustees, to issue to him a retail liquor license. This is an appeal prosecuted from such judgment. It is provided by ordinance of that city that “ for every saloon, bar, or place where spirituous, vinous, etc., liquors are sold or given away in less quantities than one quart, a license tax of fifty dollars a month is imposed.” It is further provided that any person desirous of engaging in such business must make written application to the board of trustees for a license therefor, and such application must be accompanied with a bond with two sureties in the sum of two thousand dollars, conditioned that the applicant shall keep a quiet and orderly house, etc. The application contemplated by the ordinance was made, accompanied by a good and sufficient bond. This is conceded by the trustees, but they denied the application, upon the ground “ that in the exercise of their best judgment and discretion in *536 said matter, and under and in pursuance of an honest belief on the part of the members of said board that the welfare and good…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.