Broderick

Smith v. Broderick

Good Law
107 Cal. 644·1895 Cal. LEXIS 803·40 P. 1033
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJuly 2, 1895No. 15833California3,853 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Harrison, J.

The plaintiff is the assignee of the claims of sundry individuals for merchandise sold and delivered by them to the city and county of San Francisco, and for labor performed by them for said municipality prior to June 9, 1893, and on that day he commenced an action against the city and county to recover a judgment for the amount of said claims. Prior to the commencement of the action the board of supervisors had adopted a resolution authorizing the city and county attorney to allow judgment to be taken and entered against the city and county in all cases in the litigation of claims against it for supplies, material, and labor, “where such claims are or have been examined or corrected by the finance committee of this board through the expert of said committee,” for the amounts approved by said committee. After the plaintiff had commenced his action the expert of the finance committee reported to that body that he had examined the claims, and that the amount named in the plaintiff’s suit was the correct amount due him. Thereupon the finance committee directed the city and county attorney to allow judgment to be taken against the city and county for the amount *646 claimed by the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.