Lakeshore Cattle Co. v. Modoc Land & Livestock Co.

Good Law
108 Cal. 261·1895 Cal. LEXIS 853·41 P. 472
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJuly 27, 1895No. 18330California536 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Harrison, J.

Appeal from an order denying a motion to change the place of trial. The defendant is a corporation, whose principal place of business is in the city and county of San Francisco, and the present action was brought against it in the superior court for the county ®f Modoc. After the summons had been served upon the defendant it made a motion to have the place of trial changed to San Francisco, upon the ground that that was the county of its residence. The motion was denied, and the defendant has appealed.

The facts alleged in the complaint show that the obligation of the defendant to the plaintiff arose in the county of Modoc, and, under the provisions of section 16 of article XII of the constitution, the action was properly brought in that county. At the hearing of the present motion the defendant attempted to controvert these averments of the complaint by the affidavit of Bayley, who was its president at the time of the alleged transactions, and urges that, as it appeared from this affidavit that the averments in the complaint were false, the court erred in denying this motion. Without determining whether a court would be authorized in any case to determine that the affidavits…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.