Leyshon

People v. Leyshon

Good Law
108 Cal. 440·1895 Cal. LEXIS 871·41 P. 480
Supreme Court of CaliforniaAugust 5, 1895No. 21200California636 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Searls, J.

Information for forgery. The defendant was charged with having forged the name of Mrs. Maggie Henry and Eliza J. Clark to a certain promissory note, set out in the, information, with intent to defraud one A. J. Graham, and to have knowingly, willfully, feloniously, etc., uttered, passed as true and genuine, the said promissory note, with intent to defraud said A. J. Graham, etc.

Defendant demurred to the information upon the ground that it charges two offenses, viz., the crime of forgery committed April 23, 1894, and also the crime of passing a forged note on the twenty-fourth day of April, 1894.

The demurrer was overruled and the ruling is assigned as error.

Section 470 of the Penal Code provides that: “ Every person who, with intent to defraud another, falsely makes, alters, forges, or counterfeits any .... note, .... or utters, publishes, passes, or attempts to pass, as true and genuine, any of the above-named false, altered, forged, or counterfeited matters, as above specified and described, knowing the same to be false, altered, forged, or counterfeited, with intent to prejudice, damage, or defraud any person, .... is guilty of forgery.”

As was said in People v. Frank, 28…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.