Weid

Witmer Bros. v. Weid

Good Law
108 Cal. 569·1895 Cal. LEXIS 893·41 P. 491
Supreme Court of CaliforniaAugust 27, 1895No. 19531California1,991 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Vanclief, J.

Action on two promissory notes made by defendant to James McLoughlin, each for five hundred dollars, with interest after maturity at rate of one per cent per month, and assigned by McLoughlin to plaintiff.

The judgment was in favor of plaintiff for the full amount of principal and interest of both notes. Defendant appeals from the judgment, and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

*572 The notes were made to secure payment of defendant’s subscription of one thousand dollars, to be paid to McLoughlin in consideration of the construction of a proposed street railroad on a specified route passing through defendant’s land. The following is a copy of the subscription contract:

The findings of fact bearing on the points made by appellant are as follows:

It will be observed that the road was. not completed within four months after the date of the contract, as provided therein, nor until the 8th of August,-1888. As to the cause of this delay, the court found: 1. That the contract was not fully executed by all the parties of the first part until January 24, 1888, when the notes were deposited with Bonebrake; 2. That the parties of the first part failed to procure the right…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.