Woodworth

Bradford v. Woodworth

Good Law
108 Cal. 684·1895 Cal. LEXIS 904·41 P. 797
Supreme Court of CaliforniaSeptember 5, 1895No. 18342California392 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Temple, J.

Appeal from the judgment and from an order denying a new trial.

This action was brought to recover the value of lumber alleged to have been sold by plaintiff to defendant to be used in the construction of a quartz-mill on the Rising Sun Mine.

The answer denies all the material allegations of the complaint, and avers that the lumber was sold by plaintiff to the Yosemite Mining Company—a corporation incorporated in the state of Illinois.

The court found that the lumber was sold to the defendant, but that at the time the defendant was the president of the Yosemite Mining Company, and for that company was in charge of and engaged in the management of the Rising Sun Mine. The court further found as follows:

It is claimed that the evidence does not support this finding, but a careful reading of the transcript convinces me that it is only one of numerous cases presented here where the real claim is that the finding is not supported by the preponderance of the evidence. Certainly the testimony of the plaintiff himself supports the finding in every respect, and the opposing testimony is not very positive upon the most material points. It tends rather to show that plaintiff may have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.