In re Fife

Good Law
110 Cal. 8·1895 Cal. LEXIS 1007·42 P. 299
Supreme Court of CaliforniaNovember 7, 1895Crim. No. 99California1,045 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

McFarland, J.

This is a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The petitioner shows that she was convicted in the police court of the city of Los Angeles of the offense of vagrancy; that she appealed to the superior court of the county of Los Angeles, where the judgment of the police court was affirmed, and that she did not waive a jury in the said police court, and expressly made a demand in the superior court for a jury, and said demand was refused. Her contention is that having been tried and convicted, under these circumstances, without the intervention of a jury, her imprisonment is illegal, and that she should be restored to her liberty upon habeas corpus.

In the recent case of Ex parte Wong You Ting, 106 Cal. 296 , we took occasion to inquire somewhat fully into the right of a jury trial in criminal cases, and our conclusion there was that the legislature might provide for summary proceedings without a jury in cases of such petty offenses as were thus provided for in certain early English statutes and in cases which are intrinsically of a similar nature and degree as those mentioned in said statutes. Vagrancy is, we think, one of those offenses, and the legislature might provide by a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.