Boyce

Boyce v. Fisk

Good Law
110 Cal. 107·1895 Cal. LEXIS 1025·42 P. 473
Supreme Court of CaliforniaNovember 18, 1895No. 18443California2,802 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

This action was brought to obtain a decree to the effect that Thomas Boyce was, at the time of his death, the owner in fee simple of an undivided half of section 15 in township 14 south, range 14 east, Mt. Diablo base and meridian, situate in the county of Fresno, state of California; that an accounting be had to determine the amount due to defendant upon a mortgage; and that defendant has no right, title, or interest in the land, except as a mortgagee thereof, and that upon the payment to defendant of such sum as may be found due him (if any) he be required to satisfy his mortgage.

The cause comes up on the appeal of plaintiff from the final decree, and is presented upon the judgment-roll, unsupported by any statement or bill of exceptions.

The findings show that on the seventh day of August, 1880, Thomas Boyce was the owner of the tract of land hereinbefore mentioned, and that on said last-mentioned day he borrowed from Asa Fisk, the defendant and respondent herein, the sum of $260, and made to the latter his promissory note in writing in the words and figures following:

To secure the payment of the said promissory note, Boyce executed and delivered to Fisk a deed of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.