Witte

Witte v. Taylor

Good Law
110 Cal. 224·1895 Cal. LEXIS 1045·42 P. 807
Supreme Court of CaliforniaNovember 30, 1895L. A. No. 56California376 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Garoutte, J.

This is an action to recover commissions for the sale of certain real estate. A general demurrer was sustained to the complaint, and plaintiff appeals from the judgment rendered thereon. The action is based upon the following clause of a written contract entered into between plaintiff and defendant:

The complaint sets out the contract, and then alleges that plaintiff used his best efforts to make the sale, and succeeded in obtaining from James an offer to sell said undivided one-half of the ranch to defendant, but that defendant refused to purchase said undivided one-half, but thereupon purchased an undivided one-third from said James upon terms satisfactory to him, defendant The complaint prays for judgment for the sum of $1,333.33, that sum being a proportionate amount of the agreed compensation of $2,000.

*226 The complaint fails to state a cause of action. It is Based upon a written contract, and there is no allegation that a compliance has been had with its terms. But, on the contrary, the affirmative allegations show that the main condition precedent to the payment of the commission has never occurred. Again, the commission was not to be paid until six months “from date…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.